3D TVs go head to head in our latest video
Mar 16, 2010 Technology
Big Differences In 3D TVs
Our TV experts are continuing to test the 3D TVs we’ve been telling you about for the past week. Though we haven’t completed our in-depth tests yet, we’re seeing some performance differences between the models. All three sets—Samsung’s 46-inch 7000- and 8000-series LCD TVs, and Panasonic’s 50-inch VT-20 series plasma—produced compelling, realistic three-dimensional images, but they didn’t look identical.
Step into our video lab to learn more. See for yourself how the TVs differed, and which looked best. We’ll keep you posted as we complete our tests and have even more detail to share.
Next Steps
All TV Ratings
Subscribers can view and compare all TV Ratings.
Recommended TVs
Look at the ones that we chose as the best of the best.
Tags: 3d tv, lcd tvs, Photography, plasma tvs
Daily Dispatch: Facebook experiments with QR codes; Intel launches low-cost solid-state drive
Mar 16, 2010 Technology
Combing through hundreds of blog posts and news articles daily, Dirk Klingner, our technology-trend watcher, sifts through the noise to bring you the tech news most important to consumers. If you have a tip on a story you want to share, leave a comment below.
Facebook Kicks Off Implementation Of QR Codes (TechCrunch)
… Facebook appears to have started enabling users to generate custom two-dimensional QR codes. From the looks of the screenshot embedded above, there are two types of QR codes: a personal barcode or a “status QR barcode”. This also seems to appear on Facebook Fan Pages.
Intel Intros 40-GB SSD For $125 (ChannelWeb)
Intel signaled its intent to lead the entry-level SSD market with the introduction of a 40-GB SSD with a price of only $125. Intel on Monday unveiled its X25-V Value SATA solid state drive (SSD), a new line aimed at the netbook, notebook, and desktop PC market.
The cappuccino car that runs on coffee… so will you have to use the filter lane? (MailOnline)
A car that runs on coffee is unveiled today – but it certainly won't take the grind out of commuting. And at between 25 and 50 times the cost of running a car on petrol, the invention won't please any motor industry bean-counters either.
PayPal Launches Revamped iPhone App, Teams With Bump For Phone-Tapping Money Transfers (TechCrunch)
PayPal has just launched an upgraded iPhone application that adds new features and includes a facelift that’s meant to help instill a greater sense of security. And it also brings with it big news for Bump Technologies, the startup that lets you exchange information simply by tapping smartphones together: Bump is now prominently featured in the PayPal iPhone application as a quick way to initiate transactions.
Lighter side: Pomplamoose cover Lady Gaga's "Telephone" in a VideoSong (PomplamooseMusic)
Tags: daily-dispatch, electronics, Internet, Photography
Consumers Union responds positively to FCC’s broadband plan
Mar 16, 2010 Technology
In response to the National Broadband Plan presented to Congress today by the Federal Communication Commission, Joel Kelsey, a policy analyst with Consumers Union (the nonprofit parent company of Consumer Reports) released the following statement.
We commend the commission for the goals and the vision in this plan to bring affordable, high-speed Internet access to all Americans. The U.S. has fallen behind other countries, both in terms of how many people have broadband and the speed of those connections. This plan seeks to knock down the biggest obstacles to bringing high-speed Internet to more people at a reasonable price. This is the first step in a long process. The commission has laid out a lot of important questions the government must answer to put us on the right path, and we look forward to working with the commissioners and Congress on the road ahead.
In its own statement today, the FCC detailed its vision for the American broadband network [PDF] by 2020. Among other goals, the plan calls for promoting competition in the broadband market and closing certain "broadband gaps." Those gaps include the 100 million Americans who currently have no broadband access at home (especially in rural areas and among "vulnerable" populations) and the shortage of broadband spectrum for mobile devices.
—Nick K. Mandle
Tags: digital cameras, Internet, internet/online, News, Technology
Happy 25th birthday, Dotcom
Mar 15, 2010 Technology
March 15, 1985: Symbolics, a computer company, registered the very first ".com" domain name, spinning an early thread in what would become the World Wide Web. A mere 25 years later, millions of us pay daily homage to that creation by frittering away our time, sometimes 24/7, tweeting, blogging, and posting our brilliant insights on social networks.
This is a perfect moment to an take a breather from surfing and—with no disrespect to such cyberspace icons as YouTube, Hulu, Facebook, and Twitter—contemplate the tradeoffs we've made since the Web began to pull us in.
As complex as our relationships with dotcoms have become, maybe this quick poll is a little simplistic. (It's definitely not scientific.) But you will be able to see instantly how your fellow readers feel, and that's something you couldn't have done 25 years ago.
—Nick K. Mandle
Tags: computers and internet, digital cameras, Internet, internet/online, nick k. mandle
Happy 25th birthday, Dotcom
Mar 15, 2010 Technology
March 15, 1985: Symbolics, a computer company, registered the very first ".com" domain name, spinning an early thread in what would become the World Wide Web. A mere 25 years later, millions of us pay daily homage to that creation by frittering away our time, sometimes 24/7, tweeting, blogging, and posting our brilliant insights on social networks.
This is a perfect moment to an take a breather from surfing and—with no disrespect to such cyberspace icons as YouTube, Hulu, Facebook, and Twitter—contemplate the tradeoffs we've made since the Web began to pull us in.
As complex as our relationships with dotcoms have become, maybe this quick poll is a little simplistic. (It's definitely not scientific.) But you will be able to see instantly how your fellow readers feel, and that's something you couldn't have done 25 years ago.
—Nick K. Mandle
Tags: computers, nick k. mandle, Photography, Technology
New printer Ratings: Some models are Web-enabled
Mar 15, 2010 Technology
HP PhotoSmart Premium with TouchSmart
Web
Web
Smart phones, particularly the iPhone, have generally received the lion's share of attention when it comes to apps, software applications that are downloaded onto a consumer electronic device. But other devices are getting into the act, including printers. Two that can download apps–the HP PhotoSmart Premium Web and the Lexmark Platinum Pro905–are both now in our all-in-one printer Ratings, which have just been updated. Both cost about $300, which is pricey for an all-in-one.
In theory, these well-connected printers should let you print something without having to use a computer. Both do require a 'Net connection, though they go about their business quite differently.
The HP has a dozen or so built-in apps, with eight more free ones available for downloading. The interface is quite clean and intuitive. HP includes, among others, a USA Today app (for printing a page or two of news), a Google Maps app (for printing maps and directions), a Snapfish app (for logging into a photo-sharing account and printing photos) and a Weathernews app (for local weather). Before you print something, you can preview it on a touchscreen. The web connectivity is well-thought out. It even lets you download updates to the printer's firmware without using a computer.
Lexmark's printer, on the other hand, did not quite hit the mark. It includes just two built-in apps (ID Card Copy and Photo Reprint) that weren't very intuitive or useful. Plus, in order to download apps, you must use your computer, which defeats the purpose of having 'Net connectivity. Like HP, Lexmark did have a number of apps available (19 as of this writing) online, but we didn't think they were very compelling and or added much value to the printer.
In addition to all-in-one printers, we also have new regular inkjets and snapshot printers in our Ratings.
Do you think an Internet-connected printer is a gadget whose time has come, or just a flash in the pan? Weigh in below.
—Terry Sullivan
Tags: digital cameras, internet/online, News, terry sullivan
New printer Ratings: Some models are Web-enabled
Mar 15, 2010 Technology
HP PhotoSmart Premium with TouchSmart
Web
Web
Smart phones, particularly the iPhone, have generally received the lion's share of attention when it comes to apps, software applications that are downloaded onto a consumer electronic device. But other devices are getting into the act, including printers. Two that can download apps–the HP PhotoSmart Premium Web and the Lexmark Platinum Pro905–are both now in our all-in-one printer Ratings, which have just been updated. Both cost about $300, which is pricey for an all-in-one.
In theory, these well-connected printers should let you print something without having to use a computer. Both do require a 'Net connection, though they go about their business quite differently.
The HP has a dozen or so built-in apps, with eight more free ones available for downloading. The interface is quite clean and intuitive. HP includes, among others, a USA Today app (for printing a page or two of news), a Google Maps app (for printing maps and directions), a Snapfish app (for logging into a photo-sharing account and printing photos) and a Weathernews app (for local weather). Before you print something, you can preview it on a touchscreen. The web connectivity is well-thought out. It even lets you download updates to the printer's firmware without using a computer.
Lexmark's printer, on the other hand, did not quite hit the mark. It includes just two built-in apps (ID Card Copy and Photo Reprint) that weren't very intuitive or useful. Plus, in order to download apps, you must use your computer, which defeats the purpose of having 'Net connectivity. Like HP, Lexmark did have a number of apps available (19 as of this writing) online, but we didn't think they were very compelling and or added much value to the printer.
In addition to all-in-one printers, we also have new regular inkjets and snapshot printers in our Ratings.
Do you think an Internet-connected printer is a gadget whose time has come, or just a flash in the pan? Weigh in below.
—Terry Sullivan
Tags: Internet, ratings, Technology
3D TV shoot-out: Samsung’s LCD vs. Panasonic’s plasma
Mar 13, 2010 Technology
As you might know from our previous blogs, we’ve been testing the first new 3D TVs on the market—Samsung’s 46-inch 7000- and 8000-series LCD TVs with LED backlights and 240Hz technology, and Panasonic’s 50-inch VT-20 series 1080p plasma. We bought the Samsung 7000-series set at retail, and purchased the 8000-series model and Panasonic’s plasma as pre-retail samples directly from the company.
For the purposes of our tests, we connected the TVs to each company’s new 3D Blu-ray player, and then switched them to see if the Samsung Blu-ray would work on the Panasonic TV, and vice versa. (They did.) While the Monsters vs. Aliens 3D Blu-ray disc played on both players—as it should per the Blu-ray 3D specification—the 3D demo disc from Panasonic, which includes clips from the Astro Boy movie, plus some sports and nature live sequences, would only play on the Panasonic Blu-ray player.
While we haven’t completed our comprehensive tests on these sets, we have already seen some performance differences between the models, which in the 3D mode are mirroring some of the differences we see when we test LCD and plasma TVs with regular high-definition programs.
So how did the TVs perform? As we’ve reported, when displaying 3D all three sets delivered impressive three-dimensional effects in full 1080p resolution. All were were able to provide a reasonably bright picture, which is advantageous when using 3D shutter glasses, which can make images appear dim.
Overall the Samsung sets provided excellent picture detail, with satisfying colors and contrast. But we did notice some cloudiness on both the 7000-series model—which uses a conventional edge LED backlight—and the 8000-series set—the first set we’ve seen that uses an edge LED backlight with local dimming—which can be distracting when viewing dark scenes. Also, both Samsung sets exhibited a degree of “crosstalk,” or ghosted images, on 3D content, indicating that the images for each eye weren’t being kept completely separate. It wasn’t so noticeable as to be distracting on all scenes, but when visible the image echoes diminished the 3D effect. We also noticed that if you tilted the 3D glasses, such as you would if you were lying down watching the TV, the picture would increasingly get dimmer.
Panasonic says its VT20 sets (as well as the VT25 models that will arrive soon) have new features designed to help boost performance. One is its “infinite black” technology, intended to improve black-level performance. In fact, this TV’s black levels were excellent, the best we’ve seen from a TV since our review of Pioneer’s Kuro models. We also found picture detail to be excellent. Unusual for a plasma set is the inclusion of blur-reduction circuitry, which was extremely effective. Based on our preliminary tests, this TV may have the best anti-blur performance of any plasma we’ve ever tested (although we wonder why it’s a feature that has to be activated).
When viewing 3D content, the TV was absolutely free from crosstalk, with sharp, clean edges on objects in scenes. Also, the set’s virtually unlimited viewing angle with regular high-def programs held true with the 3D content we played, so even those viewing the screen from an angle could see a great picture. Also, there was no change in the picture if the 3D glasses were tilted sideways, unlike the LCD sets.
So what’s our initial reaction to these sets? All the tested sets can produce compelling, realistic three-dimensional images that can duplicate the excitement you’d get in a movie theater. But based on our preliminary tests, we give the Panasonic the edge. In the 3D mode, its lack of crosstalk and great black levels really made three-dimensional images pop. It also didn’t have any issues with backlight cloudiness, and offered a very wide viewing angle. But remember that we haven’t completed our final tests, and haven’t seen enough 3D sets to make any judgments about whether plasma or LCD is inherently a better technology for displaying 3D. But we can’t wait to get more sets into our TV Lab.
—James K. Willcox and Claudio Ciacci
Tags: james k. willcox, Photography, Technology
7 things you need to know about 3D TV
Mar 12, 2010 Technology
First tests of 3D TVs
3D TVs arrived in stores this week, and consumers have lots of questions. The big one, of course, is whether these new TVs can recreate the 3D excitement we’ve been getting in movie theaters in our own homes. Based on our exclusive tests of the first models available, the answer is a resounding “yes,” as our video demo clearly shows.
Here are seven things you need to know about 3D:
1. It looks great. The results of our preliminary tests of two Samsung LCD sets and a Panasonic plasma TV have been impressive. The high-definition, 1080p images on these TVs have excellent three-dimensional depth, color, and detail—especially with animated content—creating a compelling and realistic three-dimensional experience. You’ll be ducking when that Frisbee comes flying toward you!
2. A few sets are in stores now, with more to come soon. As of mid-March, there are three 3D TVs in stores: two LCD sets from Samsung, the 46-inch UN46C7000, $2,600 at Sears, and the 55-inch UN55C7000, $2,970 at Best Buy and $3,300 at Sears. The 50-inch Panasonic TC-P50VT20 plasma we tested is available in select Best Buy Magnolia stores for $2,500. 3D TVs from other brands (including LG, Sony, Toshiba, and Vizio) are expected to arrive over the next few months.
3. You have to wear special glasses to watch 3D on a TV. Without glasses, you’ll see blurry double images. These aren’t the old-fashioned cardboard glasses you used to get at movie theaters, but high-tech active LCD shutter glasses. You can put them over your regular specs, though some might find this uncomfortable. You get one or two pairs of glasses with some 3D TVs, but other sets don’t include any. Expect to pay about $150 for each pair of glasses, at least initially.
4. A 3D set isn’t just for 3D. It functions like any standard TV with regular programs, and shifts into 3D mode when it detects 3D content. You don’t have to wear glasses to watch regular programming.
5. The only thing to watch in 3D right now are movies on Blu-ray discs. 3D TV channels from DirecTV, ESPN are expected this summer, and the Discovery Channel is expected to offer 3D at some point soon, but for now, movies are the only game in town. Monsters vs. Aliens is one of the first 3D movies available, but more are coming soon, including Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs, expected in April. You’ll need to buy a new 3D-capable Blu-ray player (about $400) to play these discs. (There are some older 3D movies—such as Journey to the Center of the Earth, Polar Express, and Coraline—that use the old-style cardboard anaglyph glasses, but they’re not comparable to the new 3D.)
6. Prices aren’t sky-high. The 3D TVs announced so far cost several hundred dollars more than regular sets that have similar features (aside from 3D). The lowest-priced 3D set now on the market, a 50-inch Panasonic plasma, costs $2,500. Lower-priced models are due soon, including a 46-inch $1,700 LCD set and an $1,800 50-inch plasma TV from Samsung.
7. Buying now makes sense for some consumers. If you’re in the market for a fairly high-end TV anyway, you might want to consider a 3D set. It won’t cost much more than a regular TV, and you won't have to think about buying yet another new TV in a year or two when there’s lots of 3D content to watch, both on TV and on Blu-ray discs. There are only a few sets on the market now, but you’ll have more of a selection in a few months. However, if you don’t need a new TV, we wouldn’t rush out to buy one (unless you’re a well-heeled early adopter itching for the latest and greatest technology). Prices for 3D TVs and Blu-ray players are no doubt going to drop over time, you’ll have more models to choose from, and there’ll be more 3D to watch. Catch up with our ongoing coverage of 3D TV in our earlier posts.
—Eileen McCooey
Tags: 3d tv, eileen mccooey, News
7 things you need to know about 3D TV
Mar 12, 2010 Technology
First tests of 3D TVs
3D TVs arrived in stores this week, and consumers have lots of questions. The big one, of course, is whether these new TVs can recreate the 3D excitement we’ve been getting in movie theaters in our own homes. Based on our exclusive tests of the first models available, the answer is a resounding “yes,” as our video demo clearly shows.
Here are seven things you need to know about 3D:
1. It looks great. The results of our preliminary tests of two Samsung LCD sets and a Panasonic plasma TV have been impressive. The high-definition, 1080p images on these TVs have excellent three-dimensional depth, color, and detail—especially with animated content—creating a compelling and realistic three-dimensional experience. You’ll be ducking when that Frisbee comes flying toward you!
2. A few sets are in stores now, with more to come soon. As of mid-March, there are three 3D TVs in stores: two LCD sets from Samsung, the 46-inch UN46C7000, $2,600 at Sears, and the 55-inch UN55C7000, $2,970 at Best Buy and $3,300 at Sears. The 50-inch Panasonic TC-P50VT20 plasma we tested is available in select Best Buy Magnolia stores for $2,500. 3D TVs from other brands (including LG, Sony, Toshiba, and Vizio) are expected to arrive over the next few months.
3. You have to wear special glasses to watch 3D on a TV. Without glasses, you’ll see blurry double images. These aren’t the old-fashioned cardboard glasses you used to get at movie theaters, but high-tech active LCD shutter glasses. You can put them over your regular specs, though some might find this uncomfortable. You get one or two pairs of glasses with some 3D TVs, but other sets don’t include any. Expect to pay about $150 for each pair of glasses, at least initially.
4. A 3D set isn’t just for 3D. It functions like any standard TV with regular programs, and shifts into 3D mode when it detects 3D content. You don’t have to wear glasses to watch regular programming.
5. The only thing to watch in 3D right now are movies on Blu-ray discs. 3D TV channels from DirecTV, ESPN are expected this summer, and the Discovery Channel is expected to offer 3D at some point soon, but for now, movies are the only game in town. Monsters vs. Aliens is one of the first 3D movies available, but more are coming soon, including Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs, expected in April. You’ll need to buy a new 3D-capable Blu-ray player (about $400) to play these discs. (There are some older 3D movies—such as Journey to the Center of the Earth, Polar Express, and Coraline—that use the old-style cardboard anaglyph glasses, but they’re not comparable to the new 3D.)
6. Prices aren’t sky-high. The 3D TVs announced so far cost several hundred dollars more than regular sets that have similar features (aside from 3D). The lowest-priced 3D set now on the market, a 50-inch Panasonic plasma, costs $2,500. Lower-priced models are due soon, including a 46-inch $1,700 LCD set and an $1,800 50-inch plasma TV from Samsung.
7. Buying now makes sense for some consumers. If you’re in the market for a fairly high-end TV anyway, you might want to consider a 3D set. It won’t cost much more than a regular TV, and you won't have to think about buying yet another new TV in a year or two when there’s lots of 3D content to watch, both on TV and on Blu-ray discs. There are only a few sets on the market now, but you’ll have more of a selection in a few months. However, if you don’t need a new TV, we wouldn’t rush out to buy one (unless you’re a well-heeled early adopter itching for the latest and greatest technology). Prices for 3D TVs and Blu-ray players are no doubt going to drop over time, you’ll have more models to choose from, and there’ll be more 3D to watch. Catch up with our ongoing coverage of 3D TV in our earlier posts.
—Eileen McCooey
Tags: eileen mccooey, News, Technology, television
